Super Bowl Security Goes The Full New World Order

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- Law enforcement officials will use radiological detection devices, metal detectors and police dogs for a full-fledged anti-terrorism effort at Super Bowl XLVIII on Feb. 2.

CHECK OUT THESE SNAPPY NEW UNIFORMS SPORTED BY THE NJ TRANSIT POLICE.

"CHRIS CHRISTY BE DAMNED...HE AIN'T GONNA GET IN OUR WAY!!!"

I just can't help myself...When I saw this news conference, the first thing that came to my deranged mind was...

" ALL WE NEED NOW ARE SOME HOBNAIL BOOTS ON THESE JACKBOOTED THUGS!"

Appearances are everything in today's media obsessed world, and I truly believe that the NJ State Police are ready for the New Obama World Order.

"ALL WE NEED IS ONE MORE GOOD CRISIS"

"Nobody at this table needs to be reminded, in the shadow of the World Trade Center, how important this event is to make people safe in our region," New Jersey Transit police chief Christopher Trucillo said.

The Big Apple Super Bowl

The countdown to Super Bowl XLVIII has begun. ESPNNewYork.com has all the latest news and views. SBNY Blog

Eight officials from various New York, New Jersey and national agencies were part of a news conference on security issues on Wednesday at MetLife Stadium. Their comments are the culmination of two years of planning for the first outdoor Super Bowl in a cold-weather climate.

This Says It All

 

H/T to Madd Medic

Schools Required to Implement Discipline Quotas...And They Need More Cash!

This Is Why We Must Be Forced To Spend More On NYC Public Schools

NYC principal Marcella Sills enjoys the warmth of her luxurious fur coat. She is also known for tooling around in a pricey BMW...



Meanwhile at her school,

Students at PS 106 in Far Rockaway, Queens, have gotten no math or reading and writing books for the rigorous Common Core curriculum, whistleblowers say.

The 234 kids get no gym or art classes. Instead, they watch movies every day.

“The kids have seen more movies than Siskel and Ebert,” a source said.

The school nurse has no office equipped with a sink, refrigerator or cot.

The library is a mess: “Nothing’s in order,” said a source. “It’s a junk room.”

No substitutes are hired when a teacher is absent — students are divvied up among other classes.

A classroom that includes learning-disabled kids doesn’t have the required special-ed co-teacher.


About 40 kindergartners have no room in the three-story brick building. They sit all day in dilapidated trailers that reek of “animal urine,” a parent said; rats and squirrels noisily scamper in the walls and ceiling.

Principal Sills spends very little time at her job. Who can blame her? The school sounds like a real dump. Her home in Westbury, Long Island is no doubt far more pleasant.

Since no math or reading program has been provided, students spend much of their time watching “Fat Albert” and “Alvin and the Chipmunks.”

Sills receives a salary of $128,207 per year, and despite putting in very few hours at the school, manages to collect overtime. PS 106 is a Title 1 school, so it gets extra federal funds. How those funds are allocated is a mystery, shrouded from the public by Obama-esque transparency.

Clearly the funds are insufficient, or kids wouldn’t be watching cartoons in rat-infested trailers instead of learning. Education funding much be increased to the point that useless educrats like Sills can live in the opulence to which they have become accustomed, with enough left over to at least buy a few books.

Alternatively, we could get inherently corrupt and inefficient Big Government as far away from education as possible. But union-funded Democrats would never go for that.


Hat tip: Gateway Pundit 

Moonbattery.

New York, New York

Start spreading the news:
I’m planning to leave today.
I don’t want to be a part of it,
de Biasio’s New York. 

Those vagabond leftists,
They are longing to stick a knife
Right through the very heart of it:
New York, New York. 

I don’t want to wake up in a city
Whose citizens vote like sheep,
And find a bum like Hillary Clinton
Is at top of the heap.  

All the elderly Jews
Are getting punched-out by black thugs in the street.
The Nazis could make a new start of it,
In de Biasio’s New York. 

If I can make it out of there,
I’d go anywhere.
Goodbye to you,
de Biasio and New York. 

The Real Reason for New Yorkers — and the rest of us — to Fear de Blasio:

What is likely to happen is that under his leadership New York will become a town of financiers, hotel maids and public and quasi-public employees. The real middle class will be driven out of the city bit by bit, perhaps replaced in part by new waves of immigrants, but they too will head out as soon as they can — and head your way.

From The American Interest...via...The Fine Report

WELFARE ABUSE: 32 years old Austin, TX welfare recipient says working is for idiots

 

“I’m thrilled that we’re going to have millions of people for the first time that have health security. It should be a great new year for lots of families across the country.”


-Scammer Katherine Sebelius

 

Sheila Jackson Leigh says "Change the name Welfare to: 'Living Trust Fund'"

 

Intelligent Populism vs. Mindless Progressivism

With elections looming in 2014, it is about time for Barack Obama to gear up another progressive “war” against the rich, the limb loppers, the fat cats, the tonsil pullers, the “enemies” of Latinos, the jet junketers, the women haters, and those who knew neither when to stop profiting nor how the government had really built their businesses.

We shall shortly witness some of the wealthiest and most privileged of capitalist America decrying inequality and unfairness from the 18th hole in Hawaii, the Malibu gated estate, and the Beacon Hill mansion.

… Barack Obama cannot finish a sentence without lamenting unfairness; but he proves to be no Jimmy Carter in scouting out the most exclusive of golf courses, and the richest of fat cats to putt with. Elizabeth Warren talks of oppressed minorities, but then invents a pseudo-Native-American identity to get a leg up on the elite competition in order to land at Harvard.
 
… The wealthier and more secluded an Oprah, the most desperately she searches for evidence of bias and inequality, finally reduced to the caricature of whining about racially driven poor service over a $38,000 crocodile handbag.
…
The liberal elite runs the culture, from universities and entertainment to government bureaucracies and the media, but it nonetheless is predicated on loudly condemning in the abstract the very creed that they embrace in the concrete.

This is how the left sees the market: a zero-sum game. If someone makes money, he took it from everyone else. The more the rich have, the less others have. It’s as if the economy is a pie that’s already on the table, waiting to be carved. The bigger the piece the rich take, the less that’s left for everyone else. The economy is just a fight over who gets how much.
But this is absurd. Bill Gates took a huge slice of pie, but he didn’t take it from me. By starting Microsoft, he baked millions of new pies. He made the rest of the world richer, too. Entrepreneurs create things.
…

Freedom isn’t fair, if fair means equal. When people are free, some will be more successful than others. Some people are smarter or just luckier. Globalization and free-market capitalism multiply the effect of smarts and luck, allowing some people to get much richer than others. So what? Inequality may seem unfair, but the alternative—government-forced equality—is worse. It leaves everyone poor.


As anyone familiar with his communist background might have predicted, Obama is reacting to the failure of his presidency and his collapse in the polls by doubling down on hard left ideology. With the international situation spinning out of control thanks to the leadership vacuum he created, the debt exploding, and ObamaCare staggering toward collapse, Obama (fresh off a $4 million Hawaiian vacation) has turned his focus to income inequality.


Only among communists is it a problem that the free market sets different prices on different people’s work. Like everything inflicted by communists, Obama’s attempts to bring the incomes of welfare loafers and brain surgeons more in line with each other will make the situation worse for everyone — especially the poor that he pretends he wants to help.
…
The point of liberal politics is not to help the poor, but to make more people poor, so as to expand the Democrat Party’s envy-driven base. Would you rather be poor in the USA — with a car in the garage, cable TV, and AC — or poor in the Soviet Union, with no amenities other than a bottle of vodka and no hope of ever getting rich?


When is capitalism bad? When it partners with government.

 Coincidentally(?), government-subsidized and/or government-partnered capitalism is the only kind of capitalism embraced by Leftists.


Read More From PJ Media


H/T to Bubba

Obama Celebrates the Lost War on Poverty

“Trickle down economics” works and there is no greater example than the Democrat delusion on the War on Poverty

After 50 years, and some $20 trillion 

dollars, we've reduced poverty by about 

2 points and now 72% of black 

households are single parent. The War

on Poverty is another progressive

failure...Allen West




That’s rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record...Dave Boyer...Washington Times

Known as “The Laffer Curve” it is one of the main theoretical constructs of supply-side economics, and is often used as a shorthand to sum up the entire pro-growth world view of supply-side economics.

Following these principles resulted in the sustained economic growth under President Reagan and many years to follow.

Sadly, the democrats pander to the poor for their votes all the while keeping them as indentured servants on the plantation.

by Keith Koffler on January 9, 2014,  The White House Dossier

One thing I’ve always found remarkable about the War on Poverty, declared 50 years ago this week by Lyndon Johnson, is that poverty today is right where it was when Johnson’s Great Society programs kicked in.

Here’s the graph. I reprint it from NPR, not the National Review.

The truth of the chart is simply undeniable. The poverty rate, as expressed by the percentage of people in poverty in the light blue line, was declining sharply until the Johnson programs – the largest increase in welfare EVER in this country – kicked in. At that point, the rate leveled off. And at 15 percent in 2013, it’s right where it was in 1965.

In fact, it’s been at 15 percent the last three years running, the worst performance since 1965. Bush’s fault, right? Well, we’re talking not about the first, second, and third years of the Obama presidency. We’re talking about the third, fourth and fifth.

Entire article below.


Imagine the howling sound we’d hear if this were Bush’s record following the recession he inherited from Clinton in 2001.

Here’s part of the statement Obama offered up Wednesday marking the anniversary:

As Americans, we believe that everyone who works hard deserves a chance at opportunity, and that all our citizens deserve some basic measure of security.  And so, 50 years ago, President Johnson declared a War on Poverty to help each and every American fulfill his or her basic hopes.

The White House made the case this week that, if you include all the free stuff, poverty has declined. And that is certainly true. What is certainly not true is that the War on Poverty was about, as Obama states, helping each and every American fulfill his or her basic hopes.

It was, rather, about alleviating the pain of poverty. The problem is, though, that by making welfare too generous, the government is using the money of hard working Americans to pay people to be poor. It has created a dependent class that is making the rational decision that work and struggle are not worth it.

Not to mention that, with our debt endlessly rising, the whole project is completely unaffordable.

Nothing can lift Americans out of poverty like a booming economy. Like the success of striving capitalists who provide goods, services, and jobs to the nation.

Yeah, Trickle Down Economics. Like it.


Nothing has fettered the underclass like the growth in government control and the decline of moral values that has occurred since the early 1960s, particularly the ruination of the family.

We need to always provide a minimum safety net in this country. Whatever the cause of one’s failure, people should not be starving in the United States. But replacing private initiative and community charity with government comes at a cost.

And the cost is destroying all of us.

H/T to Jim Campbell

I Have Discovered The Solution For "Climate Change"...and this Deep Freeze

 

LET'S WATCH "SUNNY"!

HERE

 

 

 

 

HERE IS THE REAL SOLUTION!

 

"While we are merging everything in the world that has no relation to each other why not merge Christmas, Fourth of July, Ground Hog Day, Thanksgiving Day, Labor Day, Halloween, New Year's and April's Fool all into one glorious day that would give everybody a chance to get some work done during the year. And look at the speeches, sermons and turkey it would save."     

                          

Will Rogers, 24 December 1929

 

 

 

 

 

H/T to Lee Vandenbrink

 

 

 

"Cash And Kerry"...Your $7.45 Billion Well Spent

 

Don’t worry, taxpayers, because I’m sure all this money is being spent responsibly (warning: dripping sarcasm).

From CNS News:

American taxpayers spent $7.45 billion to help developing countries cope with climate change in fiscal years 2010 through 2012, according to a federal government report submitted to the United Nations on a subject that Secretary of State John Kerry described as “a truly life-and-death challenge.” 

That sum of $7.45 billion, which reached more than 120 countries through bilateral and multilateral channels, met President Obama’s “commitment to provide our fair share” of a collective pledge by developed nations to provide a total of nearly $30 billion in “fast start finance” (FSF), the report stated. 

The pledge was made at a Dec. 2009 U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen, and the FSF funding aims to support developing countries adapt to and cope with phenomena blamed on climate change, such as droughts and rising sea levels.

To put $7.45 billion into language we can better understand, that’s almost 14 Solyndras.

Read the whole story from Michelle Malkin 

Who Watches The Watchers?

Shipping giants FedEx and UPS haven’t said much since it was revealed Sunday that the National Security Agency intercepts electronics packages to install spyware, but what they have said implies they knew what the agency was up to.

Security researcher Jacob Appelbaum co-wrote a Der Spiegel article published Sunday detailing how the NSA intercepts newly purchased computer products mid-shipment to install surveillance malware before reaching the buyer without their knowledge.

“If a target person, agency or company orders a new computer or related accessories, for example, TAO [Office of Tailored Access Operations] can divert the shipping delivery to its own secret workshops,” Appelbaum wrote. ”The NSA calls this method interdiction. At these so-called “load stations,” agents carefully open the package in order to load malware onto the electronics, or even install hardware components that can provide backdoor access for the intelligence agencies. All subsequent steps can then be conducted from the comfort of a remote computer.”

In response to Daily Caller inquiries to shipping companies UPS and FedEx asking whether they had knowledge of such a program and if they cooperated with the NSA, FedEx media relations’ Scott Fiedler responded with the following:

“The answer to your questions about ‘permission/cooperation, etc…’  is –  ’No.’”

 

THIS IS WHAT I SAY...

"YOU GONNA KNOW MY NAME AND I DON'T CARE!!!"

Fiedler decline to comment on whether FedEx was aware of the program, or give a statement describing FedEx’s official stance on the matter.

UPS declined to comment on repeated requests from TheDC.

During a weekend communication conference in Berlin, Appelbaum unveiled numerous previously unknown agency programs and capabilities that began as far back as 2007, including the NSA’s ability to hack private WiFi networks from almost 10 miles away.

Read more: Daily Caller