Monday, December 5, 2011

Which Whore Gets More?


TH Daily...One public university in North Carolina has just found money to start (in the midst of a budget crisis) a new scholarship to reward feminists for engaging in feminist political activism on the job.

Here in the Tar Heel state, this year’s budget cut in higher education is nearly 16%. But there was still enough money in the pot to create a new Janet Mason Ellerby Women and Gender Studies Scholarly Award. The award was created to recognize Ellerby’s “significant contributions to feminist scholarship and activism.”
What are those contributions? Let’s start with activism.


Some years ago, Janet Ellerby learned that the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders were slated to make an appearance at UNC-Wilmington. Ellerby joined an effort to keep the Cowgirls from coming to our campus. Why? Well, you know the reason. They wear too little clothing and help promote unhealthy (read: sexist) images of what a woman should look like. The Cowgirls were young, thin, and happy. UNCW feminists, on the other hand, place a premium on being old, plump, and angry. The Cowgirls had to go!



Of course, anyone who has ever been to UNCW recognizes the futility of banning scantily-clad women from campus. Our co-eds generally make the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders look like nuns. That’s why UNCW is sometimes referred to as UNC-Whorehouse. Personally, I’m offended by those who refer to our young women as “whores.” That’s why I was disappointed when UNCW hired a rapper to come to campus to call women “bitches” and “whores” back in 2003. (Note: He made $130,000 in the process!). But the rapper, unlike the cheerleaders, was not banned from UNCW by the feminists. Some UNCW feminists consider promiscuity to be empowering. So I suppose “whore” is just a term of endearment.

Speaking of whores, another example of Janet Ellerby’s activism would be the fight for free health care for prostitutes. While under the direction of Janet Mason Ellerby, the WRC placed a large display in the lobby of the UNCW library. The display made an argument for free health care for prostitutes with no moral condemnation of prostitution whatsoever. In fact, the display declined to refer to the women as prostitutes. It called them “sex workers.” If you haven’t seen the connection between these first two examples of feminist activism, I’ll just spell it out below (in bold letters):


FEMINISTS DO NOT WANT MEN LOOKING AT CHEERLEADERS. THEY WANT THEM TO HAVE HEALTHIER SEX WITH PROSTITUTES!...Read More



Now for the REAL WHORE of the day...

This is interesting, however Chris “TEEBALL” Mathews has not reported it. Typical...

During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the
late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues
and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama,
ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.


The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave
them financial payouts to leave the journal.


The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.
In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his
administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he
ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have
also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming
that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled
complaints.




THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the
two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy
concerns, is not publishing their names.




White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter...Read More

2 comments:

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

This all sounds familiar, but the press will protect him yet again.

Impeach, impeach, impeach !!!

Scott said...

I just wanted to "expose" these college girls openly...Well, that and the fact is Obama's past is being revisited now in the wake of the Cain smears. Where are the feminists and the gay lobby screaming foul over Obummer's indiscretions. This will be swept under the rug again to be sure.